|
|
|
Press release
ARCHIT-ACTION !
Emil Filla Gallery Ústí nad Labem
September 15 - October 21, 2006
Opening - September 14, 2006, 6 pm
With: AS-IF, Lina Bo-Bardi, Iris Dullin-Grund and Hans Wotin, 51N4E,
Anne Lacaton and Jean-Philippe Vassal,
Cedric Price, Richard Rogers and Renzo Piano, SANAA and Walter Niedermayr
A corner for one's memory? A tomb for famous mummies? A warehouse or an
archive of human work, made by humans, timeworn and obsolete, and treated
with a sense of compassion?
(Lina Bo-Bardi)
A city centre that is approachable for citizens of all social strata.
A theatre, a concert hall, libraries - for children, for music enthusiasts...exhibition
spaces and meeting places...a café made for reading,
a wine bar, a theatre café, club rooms for artistic and technical hobby
societies?
(Iris Dullin-Grund)
A tool, a factory...an active building? A centre that constantly provides
something new...a cross between the information-oriented, computerized
Times Square and the British Museum?
(Piano & Rogers)
A University of the streets?
(Cedric Price)
On September 14th, 2006, the Emil Filla Gallery Ústí nad Labem will open
at 6 p.m. the exhibition
ARCHIT-ACTION !, curated by Barbara Steiner
and Oana Tanase. This exhibition takes a look
at architectural
practices that strive or have striven in the past to establish a new and
enabling relationship between art,
architecture and society, by focussing on the user or observer and inviting
them to act. Past ideas should be
activated for current debates.
In the first half of the 20th century we find alternative approaches to
art in various avant-garde movements, such in
the work of El Lissitzky or Frederik Kiesler. The deliberate empowering
of visitors to the exhibition was coupled with
the hope that an emancipated and self-defining public might be the result.
After the Second World War the
relationship between art, architecture and society developed differently
in socialist and capitalist countries.
In the Sixties and Seventies, the plain white exhibition room became a
focus of interest in architecture and critical
(visual) art in the Western Europe and the United States. Unconnected
with history and the social environment, it
was designed to suggest, in the words of Hans Haacke, that "art floats
above the ground and has nothing to do with
the historical situation in which it comes into being". Drastic social
changes further exacerbated the conflict that
surrounded the idea of art as autonomous. Questions about representation
and exclusion, hegemony and power,
were vehemently raised and discussed. This had an effect on the way, in
which architecture was conceived: instead
of cutting itself off from the outside world, lingering in rooms consecrated
specially to aesthetic aims, art was now to
be more closely linked to the daily circumstances of life and connected
to the urban environment that surrounded it.
So buildings began to open themselves quite literally to the outside world,
with glass panes and giant display
screens providing a link between the activities inside and outside the
building, so that social and spatial boundaries
became fluid and porous. Examples are Cedric Price's Fun Palace,
the Pompidou Center in Paris designed by Renzo
Piano and Richard Rogers, and Lina Bo-Bardi's Museu de Arte in
Sao Paolo. Alternative spatial schemes, functional
pointers and presentation systems defined the locus of art and the possibilities
of encounter in a new way. This was
linked with the hope of bringing about a radical change in the way in
which art was produced and received, of
opening up to various interest groups - in short, of giving art a new
kind of social effectiveness.
The demand for the social effectiveness was always strong in the socialist
concept of art. Art was the expression of
and had to have a direct function for the socialist society. "Cultural
palaces", cultural institutions for the working
class people, functioned as venue for visual art but also for political
meetings, workshops, teaching, reading and
theatre circles. In the first decade of the late 40s and 50s the building
type of the cultural palace was strongly
connected to Soviet architecture but modified by younger architects the
60s and 70s. At that time the cultural
palace found its way back from the factories and countryside to the cities,
opened more to its urban environment
and extended its social functions. As a model we can find here the Haus
der Kultur und Bildung by Iris Dullin-Grund
in Neubrandenburg. Programmatically the concept of the cultural house
mixes works by professionals and non-
professionals. Cultural production and perception should have been accessible
to anyone.
Ideas current at the time found an added relevance in some aspects of
contemporary architecture. The knowledge
that architecture is never a neutral background to the objects exhibited,
but rather organises the gaze of the viewer
and prescribes distinct modes of reading and interpretation, makes the
relationship between the perceiving subject,
the object on view and the architectural frame a critical issue. By contrast
with the Sixties and Seventies, the social
framework (including all the political, economic, social and cultural
implications) is taken into account here. If
changeability is spoken of, then it is a matter of playing options within
quite definitely prescribed rules of play. In
this case, flexibility is deliberately restricted, so that the playing
options selected and the associated changes,
should come into view all the more clearly within a prescribed set of
parameters. The changeability of the internal
layout structure of the building not only relates to the geometry of spatial
links, it also suggests a reformulation of
the function of the room in question. The rooms are no longer designed
with a single definite function in view -
rather they imply the possibility of their own reinterpretation. Starting
from the position that the function and
significance of architecture exist on the basis of a certain social agreement,
an act of communication as a result of
which - and only as a result of which - a space can be endowed with significance
at all, what we have here is spaces
that are provided for negotiation. The buildings seem to invite us to
negotiate institutional parameters. Examples
are the 21st Century Museum of Contemporary Art in Kanazawa by
SANAA, the Groeningemuseum in Bruges and
the Lamot™-Centre in Mechelen by 51N4E, the Palais de Tokyo
in Paris, the Louvre in Lens and the Architecture
Foundation in London by Lacaton & Vassal.
The exhibition was also shown at the Galerie für Zeitgenössische Kunst,
Leipzig (May 20 - August 13, 2006).
ARCHIT-ACTION ! is part of the project againstwithin
and has been funded with support of the CULTURE
2000
programme of the European Union.
Under the title againstwithin 5 institutions
co-operate: The Museum of Contemporary Art Leipzig; the Faculty of
Art and Design, J. E. Purkyne University, Usti nad Labem; the Forum Stadtpark,
Graz; the Van Abbe Museum,
Eindhoven; the Institute for Contemporary Art and Dunaujvaros.
ARCHIT-ACTION ! exhibition as a part of againstwithin
project is kindly supported by:
CULTURE 2000 programme of the European Union
The Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic
The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
City of Ústí nad Labem
Foundation for Contemporary Art Prague
download
press release
|
|